The Ongoing Demotion of Humanity
By Stephen B. Gray
Before humans had any understanding of the world or the sky, our view of
them was necessarily extremely provincial.
With the arrival of science, our consciousness has been expanding steadily
without apparent limit, and each step has increased our perspective. The new
world views have progressively reduced the self- importance of humans relative
to all we understand. In the beginning our view was like that of an infant who
is conscious only of himself, knowing nothing of the larger world.
The traditional attempt to understand the objective world
was religion, with its anthropomorphic notion of causes; thinking that
people-like creatures are responsible for events is much easier to grasp than
general scientific principles. Science tends to be abstract, difficult, remote,
and cold; that makes its explanations unappealing to many. But as criteria for
more complete understanding developed, primitive theism has steadily given way
to the new method of discovering objective truth. Part of this process is
removing the infantile view of humanity as central to the universe; indications
are that we are a microscopic irrelevancy in the large view. Humanity has
steadily been demoted from that central view to the latter view of our
unimportance (except to ourselves). Some of the many steps in this great,
gradual diminution of our position are the following.
a. Initial Provincialism.
When the Old Testament was written, roughly from 1500
BCE to 300 BCE, most of the world was unknown. Among many other errors, this
naiveté allowed the writer of Exodus, who had no knowledge of great heights
such as 8000-meter mountains, to assert that a flood covered the entire world.
|
Genesis 7:19-20 And the waters
prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under
the whole heaven, were covered. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail;
and the mountains were covered. |
Fifteen cubits
is only about 22 feet! The Israelites’ narrow view of the world influenced
later Bible authors, who ignored the fact that most societies had never heard
of Jesus because they already had entrenched religions of their own. The Old
Testament reflects deep provincialism,
much of which carried over to the time of Jesus.
b. The Earth Rotates
Part of the
self-centered worldview was thinking that the apparent stillness of the Earth
was objectively real. The Israelites and most other ancient peoples thought the
Earth was motionless. Among other verses stating this are these.
|
Psalm 93:1 …the world also
is stabilized, that it cannot be moved. 1 Chronicles
16:30
Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable, that it be
not moved. |
The Earth,
humanity‘s abode, was naturally thought to be the static center of the
Universe. The celestial sphere and the bodies embedded in it were observed to revolve
around the world once per day. The new idea that the Earth was not stationary
but rotated on its axis, while everything else was fixed, was a major step in
reducing mankind to a more modest position. One cannot blame the Israelites for
this self-centered view any more than one can blame a child for the same thing,
but God should have known better than to commit major errors in astronomy when
inspiring the Bible.
c. The Earth is Not the Center
An even bigger step came next. Copernicus (1473-1543) suggested
that the center of the universe was the Sun, not the Earth; this started the
modern science of astronomy. Tycho observed other planets’ orbits and Kepler developed
mathematical laws governing them. Galileo observed phases of Venus, proving
heliocentrism beyond any doubt. He watched Jupiter’s major moons in their
orbits around that planet, providing more evidence that there are other centers
of revolution besides the Earth.
The old view was that humans inhabit one of three
layers in the universe, with heaven above and hell below, both existing in
relation to us. This view is of course utterly obsolete. The ordinariness of
Earth’s position in the universe is called the Copernican Principle or the Principle
of Mediocrity (not a value judgment!) which has been precisely confirmed. 1 So far we have a rotating, revolving
body as our abode, but the solar system could still be central in the universe.
d. The Sun and Other Stars
The
Sun was found to be vastly larger than the Earth, and much farther away than
previously suspected. Copernicus, Kepler (1571-1630), and Galileo (1564-1642) found
that the Sun, the ultimate source of all earthly energy and life, is a star,
and is therefore much like the thousands of other stars visible with the naked
eye. The Church took violent exception to these ideas because they moved
humanity from center stage and diminished the importance of God and Jesus. They
had no idea that this dethroning would continue so far as it has gone.
e. Stellar Distances
When it became possible to measure distances to nearby
stars, the closest one was found to be 25 trillion miles away, a distance
enormously greater than anything previously imagined. Most stars are much
farther still, with some billions of times more distant. These vast distances established
that the scale of humanity and its religions is trivial compared to the known
universe. It was starting to look like humans don’t matter much, an idea still
fiercely resisted.
f. Our Position in the Galaxy
Around 1920 it was found that the Sun is not near the
center of the Milky Way Galaxy, which at that time was thought to be the entire
universe. A new unit of distance was introduced to measure vast astronomical
scales, namely the light-year, about 5.87 trillion miles or 9.46 million
million kilometers. Our galaxy is about 100,000 light-years in diameter, with
our solar system about midway from the center to the edge. We orbit the
galaxy’s center in about 225 million years. The galaxy contains approximately
400 billion stars, of which the Sun, over one million times the volume of the
earth, is just one! The true scale of the Earth in the cosmos was becoming
apparent.
g. Innumerable Galaxies
Later, in the 1920’s, Edwin Hubble found that there
are many other galaxies, and they are receding from us. 2
These findings made it clear that we inhabit one small planet around one
unexceptional star in one typical galaxy out of many billions. The part of the
universe we can potentially see is 42 billion light-years in radius (assuming
it has a flat geometry). By one definition, the radius of the observable
universe is 78 billion light-years. 3 It follows
that we are too insignificant to matter to the universe as a whole, and nothing
we do could have the slightest effect on it. Even if we blew up the whole
planet with hydrogen bombs, the explosion would be microscopically trivial
compared to a nova or supernova; they involve the destruction of an entire
star. Not only that, but anything done on earth would take up to 100,000 years
to be noticed even in our own galaxy. Our neighbor, the Great Galaxy in
Andromeda, is similar to our own Milky Way; when it is viewed in ordinary
telescopes it looks fuzzy, but the fuzz is unresolved billions of stars.
h. Expansion of the Universe
All galaxies beyond the mutual gravitational influence
are rushing away from us and from each other. Eventually the universe will be
so dilute and so large that we will be utterly isolated, even more than we are
now. Even if in the distant future a very advanced race were able to influence
the entire galaxy, it would have no effect on anything else because there would
be no neighbors close enough to be influenced. It takes more than imagination
to think that Jesus matters in this
situation.
i. The Total Number of Stars
The number of stars in the observable universe in all
of the billions of galaxies defies ordinary imagining. This number can be made
vivid as follows: suppose that every one of the six billion people on Earth
each counted one star per second, 24/7, without stopping, and with no
duplication of counts. Each person would count 86,400 stars per day, not a
practical task! Even so, the count would not be complete for over 300,000
years! 4 Further, cosmologists are
speculating that our entire observable universe may be only an insignificant
fraction of the whole cosmos, that is, everything that exists in nature.
j. Galactic Geometry
Recently it was found
that the center of our galaxy contains a black hole, a region so dense that not
even light can escape. This black hole has the mass of four million suns, and
the sun is 300,000 times as heavy as the entire earth!
Like an individual star, each galaxy has a habitable
zone; stars and planets too close or too far from the center cannot support
life for various reasons. There are also many other known restrictions that
limit life to extremely special conditions and locations. This shows that the
universe is “fine tuned,” or life-friendly, in only a limited sense. Virtually
all of it is inhospitable to life.
k. Violent Phenomena
Such events as novae, supernovae, gamma ray bursts,
black hole collisions, quasars, and other explosive events are so far out of
the human scale that our puny lives could be snuffed out at any time. There is
no proof that this will or won’t happen. That possibility further reduces our
significance, and indicates that God may not care enough about us.
l. Conditions for Life
A theist could say that the universe has to be at
least its present age so that enough heavy elements, which accumulate as stars
explode, exist to allow life. That is probably correct, but the 100 billion or
so other galaxies are not necessary for our existence. The theist might also
argue that God made the universe this big so we would understand his full
magnificence. Is God such that he needs to make us feel puny? The God-believer
has a serious problem here concerning the unreasonable, unnecessary scale. The
usual answer that God works in mysterious ways explains exactly nothing and leads
to no answers If God wanted some live beings around to interact with, surely he
could have found a more straightforward way to create them.
m. Scale in time and Space
The big bang is now a solid, undisputed fact, in
spite of efforts by some theists to cast doubt on it. Its discovery further
dethroned humanity because the universe was found to be extremely old, and
because the galaxy we inhabit is only an unexceptional one out of billions. We
are a mere dust mote on the large scale, hardly worthy of notice in the greater
creation, let alone the sacrifice of the “only begotten son” of the creator of
the universe.
n. Age of the Earth
Some Christians have used genealogies in the Old
Testament to derive a young age of the Earth. There is no evidence backing their guess of only 6000-10000 years.
It disagrees profoundly with ages found from geology, physics, and astronomy.
The actual ages, now known accurately, are 13.7 billion years for the universe
and about 1/3 of that for the Earth. Recorded history is about 5000 years long,
about one millionth the age of the
Earth. The span of human existence is negligible compared to astronomical ages.
o. Size of the Universe
The potentially visible universe extends in all
directions from Earth by 46.5 billion light-years. We are in a perfectly
ordinary position in the universe, which has no center. The entire universe may be
infinite. 5 If God fine-tuned everything to make
human life possible, he was quite extravagant and gave us every sign that we
don’t matter at the cosmic scale. He created parts we will never be able to
observe, let alone communicate with or visit. The known size demotes the human
race to the point where it is essentially invisible.
p. There Are Many Other Planets
Astronomers have found more than 350 planets in other
solar systems, with more discovered every month. The search for life elsewhere,
primitive or intelligent, continues. All indications are that there are
billions of planets in this galaxy alone, some undoubtedly hospitable for life.
Although no communicating civilizations have been found yet, if we were to discover
one, the effect on Bible belief will be interesting. Would extraterrestrials
have heard of God’s only begotten son? If they have, they may wonder why Jesus
worked only in Israel and ignored all other countries and continents, spending
his life in about 1/10000 of the inhabitable part of the Earth’s surface. For
that matter, why did God affect only this planet? If he cared about any other
civilizations, did he have other offspring to sacrifice?
q. Our Arbitrary Frame of Reference
Einstein found that
we have no special position or velocity in space. The laws of physics are the
same for any observer, human or otherwise. With spectroscopy we see that the
laws of physics and chemistry are the same throughout the universe and
throughout observable time. There is also a personal
frame of reference, in which our intuition, supposedly given to us by God, is
completely wrong in the many situations which humans have not experienced
previously. Another fundamental question is why the universe is neither
impossible nor easy to understand. God seems to have chosen a middle way which
reveals some secrets but keeps many others (including himself) inaccessible.
Why is that?
r. Fate of the Universe
The universe will long outlast the human race but will
not go on forever, contradicting the many statements about eternity in the
Bible. Jesus promises eternal life to those who follow certain ambiguous and
contradictory rules. See Matthew 19:16-21. If God is eternal, the end of the
universe will leave him with nothing to do. Scientifically, it is presently
thought that the existence of dark energy forecloses the possibility that the
universe will stop expanding. How does that comprise fine tuning or allow for
eternity?
s. Dark Matter and Energy
The existence of dark matter shows that we are composed
of a material that isn’t what the majority of the universe is made of. 6 the discovery of dark energy shows
that we do not understand some of the most important forces in the universe. We
may find that they don’t affect our lives and have had no effect on our
history, putting us in an even more irrelevant position. Dark energy has
recently been confirmed independently of the original method. 1, 7 Whatever scientists find about
these phenomena, it is extremely unlikely that the idea of God will be
supported.
t. Parallel Universes
Cosmologists are actively speculating about the
possibility of other universes. If they exist, we may have even less importance
in the largest picture than suggested above. Scientists are seriously exploring
the idea that there was no first instant, allowing the possibility of time
before the Big Bang. 8, 9 That would
eliminate the idea that God was necessary for the universe to begin. If God can
be without a beginning, the physical universe can as well; the latter is a
simpler idea. The universe’s “prehistory” is speculative at present.
u. Extra Dimensions
Cosmologists and physicists also speculate about the
existence of more dimensions than the familiar three plus time. The active
field of string theory, an attempt to combine general relativity and quantum
mechanics, requires ten or eleven dimensions. If this is true, we humans are
confined to only a fraction of existing dimensions, placing us on the periphery
of the conceptual universe.
v. Humans Evolved
Darwin (1809-1882) and
Alfred Russell Wallace (1823-1913) discovered evolution by natural selection,
and that all life on Earth has a common origin. As a result, we have a reduced
status, having gone from being God’s unique creation to just an unusual animal.
Our intelligence is obviously unique on Earth, but we belong to the animal
kingdom in every measureable way. Believers realize that evolution would reduce
our specialness, so they fight it. If evolution is the correct story of life
and humankind, then there was no Adam or Eve, no original sin, and no need for
Jesus.
Rather than viewing humankind as a unique, wonderful,
natural creation, apologists would rather see us as degraded in the depths of
sin and doomed to hell unless favored by an invisible, capricious savior.
w. No Vital Force
Biologists have found nothing in the human body or
brain that can’t be explained at the molecular level by chemistry. At the
lowest level of explanation, we are just complex biochemical processes with no
supernatural essence. At higher levels other explanations are needed, but scientists
expect that natural ones will allow full understanding. We are entirely natural
rather than Godlike or special. The discovery of DNA has confirmed our full
membership in the natural world beyond reasonable doubt.
x. No Supernatural Phenomena
Brain researchers have found no evidence of a soul or other
supernatural phenomena. We are smarter than other animals but have no magical
spiritual essence. It is known that specific brain areas accomplish specific
types of mental processes such as recognizing faces, indicating that the mind
and brain are intimately related. The mind is completely dependent on the
brain, so when the brain dies, the mind dies too. There is no possibility of an
afterlife. The body is completely degraded soon after death, so physical
resurrection is impossible. There is no evidence that anyone has ever come back
after death.
y. Science is Impersonal
As science took over from superstition, humans lost
hope that they could control things by pleading with the gods. Weather,
disease, and natural disasters have purely
natural causes, fundamentalists of various sorts notwithstanding. Praying
to rain gods or to the Christian God does no good if they don’t exist. Science
is purely impersonal and is viewed by some less rational people as very
threatening. The replacement of superstitious beliefs by science may be the
final step in removing humans from a central, important place where we have an
illusion of control. That and the fear of death may be among the most powerful
motivators for religious belief, but that has nothing to do with the truth of
theism, if any.
z. Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence
If other
civilizations exist, presumably we are not that special to God - or maybe all
civilizations are equally so. That would dethrone humanity with finality and
beyond all argument. The ETI search has produced nothing so far, except we have
found that there is not a communicating society behind every tree. The search
is still at a very early stage.
These 24 separate
scientific findings, plus possibly item y, have removed the human race further
and further from a special position. We know that we are not central in time,
place, or composition, or qualitatively different among species. Our bodily
scale places us midway between the subatomic and galactic scales, but rather
than giving us some kind of comfort, it makes both size extremes almost
impossible to understand.
If we discover either
other universes or time before the Big Bang, religious ideas will become even
more irrelevant to understanding ourselves and our status. That status is now
fairly well understood from a naturalistic point of view, and we appear to be
no more than a trivial, microscopic accident in the big picture.
It is important to
realize that no invoking of the
supernatural has ever increased real knowledge of the natural world.
Progress in knowledge has always been in one direction: religion becomes less
relevant as science becomes more so. Science
can’t explain everything in the natural world but religion can’t explain
anything.
Our only real
importance is to the Earth, to humanity as a whole, to our country, to family
and friends, and to ourselves. Because it’s hard to care about something
completely unknown, that loyalty is quite sufficient! We need nothing
supernatural to give meaning to our lives. It is unrealistic and amusingly
provincial to think we have a special role in God’s universe; it appears exactly
as we would expect if there is no God.
Religion has several principal psychological
functions: to instill a false sense of importance, to maintain the illusion of
some control over the world and one’s life, and to prescribe morality (albeit
with severe contradictions). Most important, it gives the illusion of avoiding
death’s finality; no one can visualize his or her nonexistence with
tranquility. These beliefs offer some temporary comfort but that comfort has
the price of fleeing reality. We must look at religion for its psychological
usefulness, not for its prescientific explanations of the world.